By Alex L. Dykes on October 9, 2013

As of October, the most fuel-efficient mid-sized sedan in America is
the Honda Accord. Or so Honda says. After all, Ford has been trumpeting a
matching 47 MPG combined from their Fusion. Who is right? And more
importantly, can the Accord get Honda back into the hybrid game after
having lost the initial hybrid battles with their maligned Integrated
Motor Assist system? Honda invited us to sample the 2014 Accord Hybrid
as well as a smorgasbord of competitive products to find out.
Exterior
I have always been a fan of “elegant and restrained” styling which
explains my love for the first generation Lexus LS. That describes the
2014 Accord to a tee. Like the regular Accord, the hybrid is devoid of
sharp creases, dramatic swooshes, edgy grilles or anything
controversial. This is a slightly different take than the Accord Plug-in
which swaps the standard Accord bumper for a bumper with a slightly
awkward gaping maw. In fact, the only thing to show that something green
this way someday are some grille inserts and LED headlamps on the
top-level Touring model.
This means the Accord and the Mercedes E-Class are about the only
sedans left that sport a low beltline and large greenhouse. Opinions on
this style decision range from boring to practical and I fall on the
latter. I think the Ford Fusion is more attractive but the Hyundai
Sonata’s dramatic style hasn’t aged as well as its Kia cousin’s more
angular duds. The Camry failed to move my soul when it was new and it
hasn’t changed much over the years. This places the Accord tying with
the Optima for second place.
Interior
Despite sporting an all-new interior in 2013, you’d be hard pressed
to identify what changed over the last generation Accord unless you
owned. Instead of radical design buyers will find incremental
improvements and high quality plastics. The dash is still dominated by a
double-bump style dashboard with the second binnacle housing a standard
8-inch infotainment display. With manufacturers moving toward slimmer
dash designs the Accord’s remains tall and large. For hybrid duty Honda
swiped the Plug-in’s tweaked instrument cluster with a large analogue
speedometer, no tachometer, LED gauges for battery, fuel and a power
meter. Everything else is displayed via a full-color circular LCD set
inside the speedometer.
Front seat comfort is excellent in the accord with thickly padded
ergonomically designed front seats. There isn’t much bolstering (as you
would expect from a family hauler) so larger drivers and passengers
shouldn’t have a problem finding a comfortable seating position. The
product planners wisely fitted adjustable lumbar support and a 10-way
power seats to all trims.

Speaking of trim levels, in most ways (with the exception of that
driver’s seat), the Accord EX serves as the “feature content” base for
the hybrid. This means you’ll find dual-zone climate control,
tilt/telescoping steering wheel, standard Bluetooth, a backup camera,
keyless entry/go and active noise cancellation.
Thanks to a wheelbase stretch in 2013, the Accord hybrid sports 1.3
inches more legroom than the last Accord and is finally class
competitive with essentially the same amount of room as the Fusion and
Camry and a few inches more than the Koreans. The Accord’s upright
profile means getting in and out of those rear seats is easier than the
low-roofline competition and it also allows the seating position to be
more upright. Honda’s sales pitch about the low beltline is that it
improves visibility for kids riding in the back, I’m inclined to believe
them. As with most hybrids, there’s a trunk penalty to be paid but
thanks to energy dense Lithium-ion cells the Accord only drops 3 cubic
feet to 12.7 and I had no problem jamming six 24-inch roller bags in the
trunk. Honda nixed the folding rear seats, a feature that the
competition has managed to preserve.
Infotainment, Gadgets and Pricing
Base Accords use physical buttons to control the standard 8-inch
infotainment system and sport 6 speakers with 160 watts behind them.
Honda wouldn’t comment on the expected model split of the Accord, but I
suspect that most shoppers will opt for the mid-level EX-L which adds a
subwoofer, 360 watt amp, and adds a touchscreen for audio system
controls. The dual-screen design struck me as half-baked when I first
sampled it in the regular 2013 Accord and although I have warmed up to
it a bit, I think it could still use a few minutes in the oven if you
opt for the navigation equipped Touring model.
Honda’s concept was to move all the audio functions to the
touchscreen thereby freeing the upper screen for some other use like the
trip computer or navigation screen. The trouble is the lower screen
simply selects sources and provides track forward/backward buttons
meaning you still have to use the upper screen to change playlists or
search for tracks. That minor complaint aside, the system is very
intuitive and responsive. Honda’s improved iDevice and USB integration
is standard fare on all models and easily ties with the best in this
segment.

Starting at $29,155, the base Accord Hybrid is the most expensive
mid-sized hybrid sedan by a decent margin especially when you look at
the $25,650 starting price on the Hyundai Sonata Hybrid. However, the
Accord Hybrid delivers a high level of standard equipment including
standard Pandora smartphone app integration and Honda’s Lane Watch
system. Lane watch still strikes me as a little gimmicky since the
Accord has such small blind spots and the best outward visibility in the
segment already. Instead of stand alone options Honda offers just three
trim levels. The next step is the $31,905 EX-L model which adds leather
seats, a leather steering wheel, upgraded audio system with two LCD
screens, memory driver’s seat, power passenger seat, moonroof, a camera
based collision warning system and lane departure warning. While the
base model is a little more expensive than cross-shops, the EX-L becomes
a decent value compared to comparably equipped competitive hybrids.
Working your way up to the top-of-the-line $34,905 Touring model the
Accord is no longer the most expensive in the class, that award goes to
the $37,200 loaded fusion. At this price the Accord is less of a bargain
compared to the competition, although you do get full LED headlamps and
an adaptive cruise control system. In comparison the Camry spans from
$26,140 to $32,015, the Sonata from $25,650 to $32,395, Optima from
$25,900 to $31,950 and the Fusion from $27,200 to $37,200. How about the
Prius? Glad you asked. The Prius that is most comparable to the base
Accord Hybrid is $26,970 and comparably equipped to the Accord Touring
is $35,135.
Drivetrain
Being the drivetrain geek that I am, what’s under the hood of the
Accord hybrid is more exciting than the Corvette Stingray. Seriously.
Why? Because this car doesn’t have a transmission in the traditional
sense. Say what? Let’s start at the beginning. The last time Honda tried
selling an Accord hybrid, they jammed a 16 HP motor between a V6 and a
5-speed automatic. The result was 25MPG combined. The 2014 hybrid system
shares absolutely nothing with the old system. No parts. No design
themes. Nothing.
Things start out with the same 2.0L four-cylinder engine used in the
Accord plug-in. The small engine is 10% more efficient than Honda’s
“normal” 2.0L engine thanks to a modified Atkinson cycle, an electric
water pump, cooled exhaust gas return system, and electric valve timing
with a variable cam profile. The engine produces 141 horsepower on its
own at 6,200 RPM and, thanks to the fancy valvetrain, 122 lb-ft from
3,500-6,000 RPM.
The engine is connected directly to a motor/generator that is capable
of generating approximately 141 horsepower. (Honda won’t release
details on certain drivetrain internals so that’s an educated guess.)
Next we have a 166 horsepower, 226 lb-ft motor that is connected to the
front wheels via a fixed gear ratio. Under 44 miles per hour, this is
all you need to know about the system. The 166 horsepower motor powers
the car alone, drawing power from either a 1.3 kWh lithium-ion battery
pack, or the first motor/generator. Over 44 miles per hour, the system
chooses one of two mods depending on what is most efficient at the time. The system can engage a clutch pack to directly connect the two
motor/generator units together allowing engine power to flow directly to
the wheels via that fixed gear ratio. (Check out the diagram below.)

Pay careful attention to that. I said fixed gear ratio. When the
Accord Hybrid engages the clutch to allow the engine to power the wheels
directly (mechanically), power is flowing via a single fixed ratio gear
set. The fixed gear improves efficiency at highway speeds, reduces
weight vs a multi-speed unit and is the reason the system must use in
serial hybrid mode below 44 mph. There is another side effect at play
here as well: below 44 MPH, the system’s maximum power output is 166
horsepower. The 196 combined ponies don’t start prancing until that
clutch engages.
So why does Honda call it an eCVT? Because that fits on a sales sheet
bullet point and the full explanation doesn’t. Also, a serial hybrid
can be thought of as a CVT because there is an infinite and non-linear
relationship between the engine input and the motor output in the
transaxle.
Drive
Let’s start off with the most important number first: fuel economy.
With a 50/45/47 EPA score (City/Highway/Combined), the Accord
essentially ties with the Fusion on paper and, although Honda
deliberately avoided this comparison, is only 3MPG away from the
Prius-shaped elephant in the room. In the real world however the Accord
was more Prius than Fusion, averaging 45-46 mpg in our highway-heavy
(and lead-footed) 120 mile route and easily scoring 60-65 mpg in city
driving if you drive if like there’s an egg between your foot and the
pedal of choice. Those numbers are shockingly close to the standard
Prius in our tests (47-48 MPG average) and well ahead of the 40.5 MPG we
averaged in the Fusion, 35.6 in the Hyundai/Kia cousins and 40.5 in the
Camry. Why isn’t Honda dropping the Prius gauntlet? Your guess is as
good as mine.
Due to the design of the hybrid system, I had expected there to be a
noticeable engagement of the clutch pack, especially under hard
acceleration when the system needs to couple the engine to the drive
wheels to deliver all 196 combined ponies. Thankfully, system
transitions are easily the smoothest in this segment besting Ford’s
buttery smooth Fusion and night and day better than the Camry or Prius.
Acceleration does take a slight toll because of the system design with
60 MPH arriving in 7.9 seconds, about a half second slower than the
Fusion or Camry but half a second faster than the Optima or Sonata and
several hours ahead of the Prius.

At 69 measured decibels at 50 MPH, the Accord hybrid is one of the
quietest mid-sized sedans I have tested scoring just below the Fusion’s
hushed cabin. This is something of a revelation for the Accord which had
traditionally scored among the loudest at speed. When driving in EV
mode (possible at a wide variety of highway speeds) things dropped to 68
db at 50 MPH.
When the road starts winding, the Accord Hybrid handles surprisingly
well. Why surprisingly? Well, the hybrid system bumps the curb weight by
almost 300 lbs to 3,550 (vs the Accord EX) and swaps in low-rolling
resistance tires for better fuel economy. However, unlike the Camry and
Korean competition, the Accord retains the 225 width tires in the
conversion. This makes the Accord’s fuel economy numbers all the more
impressive. The Fusion is 150 lbs heavier and rides on either 225 or 235
(Titanium only) width tires which also explains why the hybrid Fusion
Titanium gets worse mileage than the base Hybrid SE model. I wouldn’t
call the Accord Hybrid the equal of the gas-only Accord EX on the road,
but the difference is smaller than you might think.

Helping the Accord out on the road are “amplitude reactive dampers”
or “two mode shocks” as some people call them. These fancy struts have
worked their way down from the Acura line and use two different valves
inside the damper to improve low and high-speed damping performance. The
difference is noticeable with the Hybrid having a more compliant ride,
and thanks to thicker anti-roll bars the hybrid is more stable in
corners. Still, for me, the Accord gives up a hair of performance feel
to the Fusion hybrid out on the road. It’s just a hair less precise, not
as fast to 60 and lacks the sharp turn-in and bite you get in the
Fusion Titanium with its wider and lower profile tires. However, keep in
mind that Fusion Titanium takes a 1-2MPG toll on average economy in our
tests dropping the Fusion from 40.5 to 38-39 MPG.
The Accord may not be the best looking hybrid on sale, (for me that’s
still the Ford Fusion) but the Accord’s simple lines and unexpectedly
high fuel economy make the Honda a solid option. Being the gadget hound I
am, I think I would still buy the Fusion, but only in the more
expensive Titanium trim. If you’re not looking that high up the food
chain, the Accord Hybrid is quite simply the best fuel sipping mid-size
anything. Prius included.
Honda provided the vehicle, insurance and gas at a launch event.
Specifications as tested
0-30: 3.2 Seconds
0-60: 7.9 Seconds
Cabin noise at 50 MPH: 69 db
Average Observed Fuel Economy: 45.9 MPG over 129 miles.
Source;