Friday, January 29, 2016

2017 Honda Odyssey spotted testing in California – Spied

by Aravind Jayachandran of www.indianautosblog.com

Expected in showrooms from H2 2016.

The 2017 Honda Odyssey was spotted testing in the hills of Southern California by Motor Trend, featuring a full body camouflage. The next generation MPV is expected to arrive in showrooms from H2 2016.

The final exterior design of the next generation Odyssey was leaked in patent images, which appear to look similar to the Odyssey sold in Japan. It features a 2016 Honda Civic-inspired grille design, quad-section Jewel Eye headlights and contemporary styling changes. The sliding mechanism of the rear door appears to have moved closer to the window on the fifth gen model.
Patent drawing of the upcoming Honda Odyssey

Under the hood, the 2017 Honda Odyssey is likely to source power from a 3.5-liter naturally aspirated i-VTEC V6 gasoline engine from the 2016 Honda Pilot, which produces 280 hp. Paired to the only engine option is likely to be a 9-speed automatic transmission.

The new Odyssey will rival market leader Toyota Sienna which is available with all-wheel drive as well as the all new Chrysler Pacifica MPV that made its premiere at the 2016 Detroit Motor Show this month.

Source;
http://indianautosblog.com/2016/01/2017-honda-odyssey-spied-testing-213354

Thursday, January 28, 2016

Some more 2017 Honda Civic Hatchback Renderings....

Source;
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/honda/civic/92475/next-honda-civic-turns-on-the-style

Dodge Dart, Chrysler 200 to go away under new FCA plan

2016 Chrysler 200 C and 2016 Dodge Dart Limited (Photo: A.J. Mueller, FCA US)
by Brent Snavely of www.freep.com

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles CEO Sergio Marchionne said today that the Dodge Dart and Chrysler 200 sedans will eventually be discontinued as the automaker refocuses its efforts on the production of its popular Jeep SUVs, Ram pickups and boosting its electric vehicle lineup.

Marchionne said the strategy is a response to market trends in the U.S. that include gas prices that have dropped to about $2 per gallon and a shift in buying patterns among Americans back to crossovers and trucks instead of cars.

The strategy also is designed to help the automaker boost production capacity for Ram and Jeep and suggests that the company will move the production of some of those models to other plants. Currently, the company cannot make enough Jeep Cherokees and Jeep Wranglers to meet demand and also struggles to make enough Ram pickups.

"We have decided to de-focus, from the manufacturing standpoint, to de-focus on the passenger car market. There are two cars in particular, the Dodge Dart and Chrysler 200, which will run their course," Marchionne said during a conference call with Wall Street analysts on Wednesday. "Without creating additional capacity, in the United States, we need to ... to try and deal with the development of both Jeep and the Ram brand."

The news is stunning, given the investments made to develop the Dart and the Chrysler 200. The automaker invested more than $1 billion to overhaul its Sterling Heights Assembly Plant to build an all-new Chrysler 200 midsize sedan that launched in 2014 and spent $600 million to launch the Dart compact car in 2012. To be fair, many of the improvements made at both plants help the automaker build any vehicle.

The Dart failed to meet sales expectations. It is among the larger compact cars on the market and is priced higher than competitors. Just over 87,000 were sold last year. The Chrysler 200 has been praised for its exterior styling and is viewed as a competitive car in its segment but has cramped rear seats.

Marchionne hinted that the Dart and Chrysler 200 could return to the market if FCA found another manufacturer willing to build the cars.
"There will be a number of things that will be put in place in the next 18 months -- things that have been agreed and detailed, that will effectively withdraw the Chrysler 200 and Dodge Dart from the marketplace, for a long period of time, during which we will be continuing discussions with potential partners," Marchionne said.

The automaker now is aiming to sell more than 2 million Jeeps globally by 2018, an increase from its prior target of 1.9 million annual sales. FCA sold more than 1.2 million Jeep SUVs globally in 2015 -- the most in the history of the brand.

While the strategy will help FCA find additional capacity for its most popular vehicles, it also positions the company as largely a manufacturer of trucks and SUVs. Removing small cars from the lineup leaves FCA vulnerable to gas price increases in the future.

Marchionne said decisions have been made to help the company achieve the production capacity it needs for Ram and Jeep. A number of plans will be put in place over the next 18 months, but he but did not outline those plans.

The Chrysler 200 is made in Sterling Heights and the Dodge Dart is made in Belvidere, Ill. The Free Press, along with a number of other publications, have previously reported that the automaker plans to move production of its Ram pickup to Sterling Heights and move its Jeep Cherokee to Belvidere, Ill.  It also is expected that the Jeep Grand Wagoneer will be built at Warren Truck.
Marchionne did not confirm any of those moves today.

The automaker has said it will launch its next-generation Jeep Wrangler in 2017, and will make the Wrangler in Toledo in the plant where the Cherokee is currently made. The company has not said what vehicle it will produce in plant in Toledo where the Wrangler is currently made.

“I think the important thing for us to reinforce is the fact that the Wrangler, in its new home in Toledo, will have additional production capacity available to try and meet demand on a global scale, and I think it’s important for us to have found a home for the Grand Wagoneer family, both the Grand Wagoneer and the Wagoneer in whatever shape they come," Marchionne said.

There are also plans to add diesel and hybrid electric versions of the next-generation Jeep Wrangler when it goes on sale by 2018. The company also plans to offer "next-generation powertrains" on its next Ram pickup and produce a mild hybrid version of its Ram pickup.

Source;
http://www.freep.com/story/money/cars/chrysler/2016/01/27/fca-build-more-jeeps-rams-under-new-production-plan/79393200/

TheTruthAboutCars: 2016 Honda Civic EX Review – All-in on Active Safety

by Alex L. Dykes of www.thetruthaboutcars.com

Honda received much flogging from the press for the last-generation Civic. The 2012 model was the result of Honda improperly reading the Magic 8-Ball amid the global slowdown. Honda’s decision makers assumed shoppers would be looking for something more modest, perhaps even austere, and changed direction to suit. The competition, assuming shoppers would be looking for greater creature comforts in a smaller package, went the opposite direction and doubled down on luxury features.

The conventional wisdom has been that Honda “stepped in it” with the ninth-generation sedan. Journalists complained about the plastic quality, the styling and … customers paid little attention. The Civic’s sales dipped slightly in 2011 during the changeover, but rapidly rebounded to over 315,000 units a year since. Some would say that Honda’s “emergency refreshes” were the reason for the sales success, but I propose a different answer: the continued sales success of the lesser-than Civic and an increase in sales of “premium” compacts showed there was plenty of room in the segment for both.

Whatever the reality, one thing is for certain: When it came time to design the tenth-generation Civic, Honda had “austere” removed from the company dictionary.

2016 Honda Civic EX

2.0-liter, DOHC I-4, direct injection, CVVT (158 horsepower @ 6,500 rpm; 138 lbs-ft @ 4,200 rpm)
Continuously Variable Transmission
31 city/41 highway/35 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)
37 (Observed, MPG)
Base Price: $19,475*
As Tested: $22,875*
* Prices include $835 destination charge.

For the full article, follow this link;
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2016/01/2016-honda-civic-ex-review-active-safety/

Wednesday, January 27, 2016

Forbes: 15 New Cars To Avoid



New cars just aren’t what they used to be. No, we’re not getting all crotchety and decrying the evolution in styling and technological breakthroughs that have literally reinvented the automobile during the last quarter millennium. Rather, we’re bemoaning the fact that, unlike as in past model years, there’s a dearth of truly wretched cars on the market for us to openly and readily ridicule.

We consulted J.D. Power for the latest results in the company’s initial quality and long-term reliability surveys and its scores for performance and design; rankings for resale value depreciation came from the automotive valuation experts at ALG. Finally, we weighed in with no less an expert source than Consumer Reports to check which models received particularly paltry scores for performance and overall value.

-Click on the text of each car to see what they said-
 
15. Smart ForTwo
14. Scion iQ
13. Nissan Titan 
12. Nissan Armada
11. Mitsubishi Mirage 
10. Mitsubishi iMiEV 
9. Lincoln MKT 
8. Lincoln MKS
7. Jeep Wrangler/Wrangler Unlimited 
6. Jeep Patriot 
5. Jeep Compass
  4. Fiat 500L
3. Dodge Journey 
2. Cadillac XTS
1. BMW 7 Series 
BMW’s flagship sedan seems to have lost its edge in recent years. It’s wrapped in languid styling and just doesn’t feel as sporty as it did in earlier renditions; an odd product lineup includes an expensive and not especially efficient gas-electric hybrid model. Consumer Reports takes the 7 Series to task for being “a ponderous, technology-laden vehicle with ungainly handling,” and is included in the publication’s lists of lowest-scoring cars, worst overall values and most expensive operating costs in its class. Not to pile on, but it also gets a rock-bottom resale value rating from ALG and a below average performance score from J.D. Power.

Tuesday, January 26, 2016

Car Connection: Honda Pilot Vs. Volvo XC90: Compare Cars

 


by John Voelcker of www.thecarconnection.com

The 2016 Honda Pilot and the 2016 Volvo XC90 are both large, seven-seat family utility vehicles, though they're about as far away from traditional SUVs in refinement and design as you can get.
 
Both are new this year, and the two cars are among our highest-rated crossover SUVs. Which one is right for you?

Either vehicle will provide comfortable accommodation for up to seven people, though the Pilot feels more spacious inside and has more family-friendly touches. The Volvo is higher on the luxury scale, despite an exterior design that's quiet and evolutionary for the sensible Swedish brand. Either one is a good purchase, but the Honda represents better value for money, and it wins on that basis.
The new and more rounded shape of the Pilot moves away from the previous model's truck-like lines. The profile is elegant, with a nice proportion of glass to metal, and the lower front end and horizontal grille play nicely off each other.

While the exterior lines of the XC90 instantly say Volvo, it's crisper and more fluid than its 15-year-old predecessor. Its shape also effectively disguises the seven-seat vehicle’s size; the Volvo simply doesn’t look as large as it is. Nor does it telegraph its prestige; as one Volvo executive said, the XC90 is a car for people who “do not look for a brand that defines them.”

Inside, the new Pilot is very well finished, combining elements from the current Accord with a few touches from the CR-V. On some versions, a huge panoramic roof opens up the cabin to a flood of natural light. The front seats are just about ideally shaped, and with step-in height about an inch lower than before, the Pilot is an even better bet for smaller or older drivers.

The Honda's middle row is adult-friendly, and for the first time, you can get a version with two captain’s chairs and a pass-through. The seat reclines for long trips and has its own tray table and cup holders. The push of a button folds down the second row, for access to the back seat, which has enough space for two adults and a surprising amount of head and leg room. Abundant cargo space includes cupholders everywhere, and a console big enough for an iPad.
As for the XC90, its luxury is on full display in a widely-lauded interior that distinguishes it from a host of German competitors. The seats are superbly comfortable, and the interior shapes in stitched leather, textured metal, and matte wood are layered to suggest Scandinavian furniture. The 9-inch touchscreen display in the center of the dash responds quickly to tablet-style commands, and is pleasantly intuitive.

The Volvo's second-row seats slide forward and backward, and the third row will accommodate two adults if they bargain for legroom with second-row riders. Theater-style seating means each row is slightly higher than the one in front, and outward vision is excellent —aided by large windows and the huge panoramic sunroof that’s a standard feature.

The Honda Pilot is powered by a 280-horsepower V-6 paired to either a six-speed automatic or a new nine-speed on Elite models. Front-wheel drive is standard, all-wheel drive is an option, and there's no plusher ride or more relaxed steering in this segment, with the Pilot feeling mature and luxurious at the wheel. Fuel economy is as high as 23 mpg combined.

The bulk of Volvo XC90s will come with a 316-hp turbocharged and supercharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine mated to an eight-speed automatic transmission. All-wheel drive is standard, and fuel economy is rated at 22 mpg. On the road, the XC90 handles like a car, with good steering feedback, predictable roadholding, and sprightly performance despite its small engine. A plug-in hybrid variant can run on its gasoline engine, on a 60-kilowatt (82-hp) electric motor on the rear axle, or on both together when needed.

Both vehicles get excellent safety ratings and have already been dubbed Top Safety Pick+ winners by the IIHS. The Honda Pilot gets the top five-star overall rating from the NHTSA; the agency hasn't yet tested the latest XC90. Both vehicles also have a full suite of electronic active-safety systems.

The Pilot ranks higher--earning 8.8 points out of 10, against the Volvo's 8.4--primarily for its better third-row space and much more affordable price tag. The XC90 scores lower on safety, not because we don't expect it to be at the top of the ratings, but because it hasn't yet been tested by the NHTSA, whereas the Pilot has.

In the end, the Honda is less expensive, slightly more capacious, and among the most flexible seven-seaters we've tested. But the Volvo is more luxurious and has a nicer interior, as well as a plug-in hybrid option. Which one you choose may come down to balancing cost, luxury, and practicality--but either is a good choice in our view.

Source (with spec comparisons and more pictures);
http://www.thecarconnection.com/news/1102046_honda-pilot-vs-volvo-xc90-compare-cars